Discrimination and other improper motives
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Subject matter (ratione materiae)
Ombudsman / informal resolution
Referral to ombudsman / mediation
Procedure (first instance and UNAT)
Confidentiality
On the Appellant’s claim for his name not to appear in the UNAT judgment, UNAT held that, due to the fact that his name had been in the public domain for a long time as a result of the publication of many court documents related to his cases before UNDT and UNAT, it would be pointless to order redaction. UNAT held that the Appellant failed to give any compelling reason as to why confidentiality should be granted and denied his request for confidentiality. UNAT held that UNDT fully and fairly considered the merits of his case and was in no doubt as to its substance. UNAT held that there was no...