Íæż½ã½ã

UNAT rejected the Appellant’s request to have all appeal-related documents removed from her UNRWA official service file. UNAT held that UNRWA DT did not err in finding no irregularity in the decision-making process under judicial review and consequently dismissing the application. UNAT held that the Appellant had to persuade it that there were flaws in the contested administrative decision not to renew her fixed-term appointment, the proceedings that led to it, or in the UNRWA DT’s judgment, which would warrant vacating the judgment. UNAT held that the Appellant had not raised new arguments, but only repeated her contentions which had been thoroughly considered and rejected by UNRWA DT. UNAT held that the evidence showed no irregularity, harassment, unlawful treatment, or discrimination against the Appellant. UNAT held that there were no grounds to reinstate the Appellant or to award her any kind of compensation, as the applicable law did not entitle her to such remedies. UNAT dismissed the appeal and affirmed the UNRWA DT judgment.