ż

UNDT/2010/139

UNDT/2010/139, Muratore

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

In its Judgment 2010-UNAT-029, El-Khatib, the Appeals Tribunal upheld the jurisprudence of the former UN Administrative Tribunal whereby only circumstances beyond the applicant’s control that prevented him from timely pursuit of his appeal can be regarded as exceptional. The fact that the applicant believed at first that the contested decision was lawful is not an exceptional circumstance, the more so as he had the possibility to obtain information on the applicable rules from the Administration. In El-Khatib, the Appeals Tribunal further recalled that “candidates for a public post are presumed to know the rules applicable to the employing public corporation”.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

OHCHR published several vacancy announcements in the framework of a broad posts regularisation exercise. The applicant applied to 21 of them. On 6 February 2006, the applicant received notice that none of his applications had succeeded. On 24 May 2006, he requested review of the decision not to select him for any of the advertised positions and subsequently filed an appeal with the JAB. The JAB rejected his appeal on the grounds that the time limit for requesting administrative review had not been complied with.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Muratore
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type