ż

UNDT/2011/064

UNDT/2011/064, Hunt-Matthes

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal, noting that the Applicant had failed to comply with the time limit set out in former staff rule 111.2(a), focused solely on whether there were “exceptional circumstances” to warrant a waiver of the time limit. The Tribunal found that the Applicant’s mere assertion that she was unable to follow-up and was incapable of submitting a reasoned appeal as a result of psychological and professional stress was inadequate to warrant a waiver of the time limits. Based on the limited submissions of the Applicant, the Tribunal was unable to establish any causal relation between her state of health and her failure to file a timely application. The Tribunal noted that it is an applicant’s responsibility to diligently pursue his/her case, and where he or she fails to do so, it is his/her responsibility to convince the Tribunal that exceptional circumstances did indeed exist.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant, a former staff member of UNHCR, is contesting, inter alia, the decision by UNHCR not to grant her an indefinite contract upon her interagency transfer from the World Food Programme (“WFP”).

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable
Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal held that this particular claim was not receivable as a result of the Applicant’s failure to file an appeal to the JAB within the time provided by the then existing rules and regulations.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Applicants/Appellants
Hunt-Matthes
Entity
Case Number(s)
Tribunal
Registry
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Language of Judgment
Issuance Type