Íæż½ã½ã

UNDT/2014/018

View PDF

UNDT/2014/018, Amany

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Receivability: Noting that the Applicant submitted his Application 3 days before requesting management evaluation of the contested decision and that his request for management evaluation was submitted a month after the deadline for the statutory delay, the Tribunal concluded that the Application was not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested the decision by UNICEF not to renew his fixed-term appointment.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Amany
Entity
UNICEF
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NBI/2013/11
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Nairobi
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Boolell
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Management Evaluation
Applicable Law
Staff Rules
UNDT Statute
Related Judgments and Orders
UNDT/2013/033
2010-UNAT-043
2010-UNAT-061
2010-UNAT-071
2010-UNAT-074
2011-UNAT-184
2013-UNAT-349