ÍæÅ¼½ã½ã

UNDT/2014/059

UNDT/2014/059, Ogorondikov

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

Upon review, the Tribunal concluded that the Applicant did not commit the misconduct of providing false information in his annual leave report. The Respondent correctly established the facts for the remaining charges of the misconduct. However, the Respondent did not fully take into account all the mitigating circumstances when determining the appropriate disciplinary sanction. The Tribunal found the disciplinary measure disproportionate to the misconduct and modified it. The contested decision is rescinded. The disciplinary measure of separation from service with compensation in lieu of notice and with termination indemnities is superseded by a written censure plus a fine of one month’s net base salary. The Respondent is also ordered to pay the Applicant compensation for loss of earnings starting from 2 February 2011 until the date of expiration of the Applicant’s contract (with MINUSTAH, until 2 January 2012), minus the fine of one month’s net base salary and the amount of termination indemnity already paid to the Applicant. In the event that the Respondent decides not to reinstate the Applicant, he is ordered to compensate him in the amount of USD5,000 plus the compensation for loss of one year’s net base salary and entitlements.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant seeks the rescission of the decision to separate him from service, with compensation in lieu of notice and with termination indemnities. The Applicant does not contest the facts but the proportionality of the disciplinary measure imposed on him.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.