Íæż½ã½ã

UNDT/2020/162

View PDF

UNDT/2020/162, Atuya

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application filed on 20 March 2019 was time barred since the Applicant was first notified of the impugned decision in July 2018.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to not renew her appointment with the Mission beyond 31 December 2018.

Legal Principle(s)

Article 8(1) of the UNDT Statute stipulates that an application must be filed within 90 calendar days of the expiry of the relevant response period for the management evaluation if no response to the request was provided.

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Atuya
Entity
MINUSCA
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NBI/2019/32
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Nairobi
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Belle
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Jurisdiction / receivability (UNDT or first instance)
Management Evaluation
Temporal (ratione temporis)
Applicable Law
UNDT Statute