UNDT/2020/173, Ross
UNDT held that the application challenging the OIOS’ decision not to investigate the Applicant’s allegation is misconceived. There was nothing to show that the decision being impunged in the Application was improperly taken, or that it was tainted by factors extraneous to the complaint. UNDT held that OIOS acted properly in referring the matters complained about back to UNHCR for appropriate investigation and action. UNDT dismissed the Application as not receivable.
The Applicant challenged the Respondent’s decision to not investigate “manifest misconduct by senior officials in UNHCR.â€
The decisions of the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) can come under scrutiny, and would constitute anadministrative decision, when it impacts on the legal rights of a member of staff or former member of staff who have standing before the Tribunal. But the decision of OIOS not to investigate would not, in and of itself, be an administrative decision that can be appealed to the UNDT.