102 (NY/2024), Stockholder
The applicable rule stipulates that an application for interim measures during the proceedings must not concern appointment, promotion or termination. As this was clearly a case where the motion for interim measures concerned appointment, the temporary relief set out in art.14 was unavailable to the Applicant.
Accordingly, the motion for interim measures during the proceedings was rejected.
In any case, the Tribunal noted that the contested decision had already been implemented as the Applicant had been separated from UNHCR.
The Applicant filed an application contesting the “[d]ecision to not to extend the Applicant’s [fixed-term appointment for an additional five year period or shorter”.
For the Tribunal to consider interim measures, several cumulative conditions set forth in the above-mentioned provisions must be met (see Nadeau Order No. 116 (NY/2015), Harvey Order No. 10 (GVA/2020)).
The Tribunal granted Respondent’s motion to exceed the page limit for the reply.