Íæż½ã½ã

UNDT/2012/204

View PDF

UNDT/2012/204, Abosedra

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The application was filed approximately eleven months after the period stipulated in the Statute and the Rules of Procedure of the Tribunal and was therefore deemed to be time-barred. Additionally, the Applicant failed to make any submissions on the issue of receivability thus the Tribunal concluded that this was not an exceptional case to warrant a waiver of the time limit. The UNDT concluded that the application was time-barred and therefore not receivable.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant appealed the non-renewal of his appointment as a result of retaliation.

Legal Principle(s)

N/A

Outcome
Dismissed as not receivable

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment
Applicants/Appellants
Abosedra
Entity
ESCWA
Case Number(s)
UNDT/NBI/2012/024
Tribunal
UNDT
Registry
Nairobi
Date of Judgement
Duty Judge
Judge Boolell
Language of Judgment
English
Issuance Type
Judgment
Categories/Subcategories
Non-renewal
Separation from service
Applicable Law
Staff Rules
UNDT RoP
UNDT Statute
Related Judgments and Orders
UNDT/2009/036
UNDT/2010/037
UNDT/2010/054
UNDT/2010/184
UNDT/2011/064