UNDT/2020/136, Chocobar
The application in respect of the alleged non-compliance with the second agreement is premature, and as such not receivable, because the Applicant has not followed the mandatory dispute resolution process contained in said settlement agreement concluded in July 2017. The Applicant’s multiples and generic complaints that the Organization has failed to follow its own rules and procedures, and her assertions regarding the conduct of her current and former reporting officers at UNGSC do not constitute administrative decisions under Article 2(1)(a) of the Tribunal’s Statute. The Tribunal DECIDES to dismiss the application as not receivable ratione materiae.
The Applicant contests the decision not to provide her with a workplan within the deadlines established in ST/AI/2010/5 (Performance Management and Development System) and the Administration’s failure to comply with a “Strictly Confidential Organizational Agreement”.
The failure to provide a workplan is a preliminary step in the performance management process that does not constitute an administrative decision under Article 2(1)(a) of the Tribunal’s Statute.