UNDT/2020/146, Mohamed
The first contested decision – the ICSC refusal to address the Applicant’s request for payment of compensation for the sexual harassment she was subjected to by the ISCS Chair is moot because the current Chair of the ICSC eventually responded to the Applicant’s request. The Chair of the ICSC is not staff of the Secretariat and therefore falls outside the scope of ST/SGB/2008/5, or the Staff Regulations and Rules. The ICSC decision not to compensate the Applicant for the sexual harassment she was subjected to by the former Chair (second contested decision) is not attributable to the Secretary-General and therefore, not reviewable by the Dispute Tribunal. Related
First contested decision: ICSC refusal to address the Applicant’s request for compensation for the sexual harassment she was subjected to by the former ICSC Chair. Second contested decision: ICSC refusal to compensate the Applicant for the sexual harassment she was subjected to by the former ICSC Chair.
ST/SGB/2008/5 only applies to staff of the Secretariat. The Administration has a duty to protect its staff from prohibited conduct regardless of the status of the person engaging in such conduct, as long as the conduct occurred in a work-related situation. The ICSC is not answerable to the Secretary-General.