UNDT/2024/084

UNDT/2024/084, Kisumiro

UNAT Held or UNDT Pronouncements

The Tribunal found that in this case, the evidence adduced by the Respondent was neither clear nor convincing. Accordingly, the Tribunal held that the Respondent had failed to show that it was highly probable that the Applicant had committed the alleged misconduct and thus had failed to meet its burden of proof. Accordingly, the Tribunal decided to:

a. Rescind the decision to separate the Applicant from service;

b. Set the amount of compensation that the Respondent may elect to pay in lieu of implementing the rescission at two years net salary with interest at the US prime rate from the date of the improper termination;

c. Implore the Administration not to elect payment of compensation in lieu of reinstating the Applicant to the position from which he was wrongfully terminated; and

d. Deny all other claims for relief in the case.

Decision Contested or Judgment/Order Appealed

The Applicant contested MONUSCO’s decision to separate him from service with compensation in lieu of notice and without termination indemnity.

Legal Principle(s)

Pursuant to the jurisprudence of the Tribunal, the role of the UNDT in disciplinary cases is to perform a judicial review of the case and assess the following elements:

i. Whether the facts on which the disciplinary measure was based were established by clear and convincing evidence;

ii. Whether the facts established amount to misconduct;

iii. Whether the staff member’s due process rights were guaranteed during the entire proceeding; and

iv. Whether the sanction is proportionate to the gravity of the offence.

Outcome

Judgment entered for Applicant in full or in part

Outcome Extra Text

The Tribunal:

a. Set the amount of compensation that the Respondent may elect to pay in lieu of implementing the rescission at two years net salary with interest at the US prime rate from the date of the improper termination; and

b. Implored the Administration not to elect payment of compensation in lieu of reinstating the Applicant to the position from which he was wrongfully terminated.

OAJ prepared this case law summary for informational purposes only. It is no official record and should not be relied upon as an authoritative interpretation of the Tribunals' rulings. For the authoritative texts, please refer to the judgment or order rendered by the respective Tribunal. The Tribunals are the only bodies competent to interpret their respective judgments, as provided under Article 12(3) of the UNDT Statute and Article 11(3) of the UNAT Statute. Any inaccuracies in the publication are the sole responsibility of OAJ, which should be contacted directly for any correction requests. To provide comments, don't hesitate to get in touch with OAJ at oaj@un.org.

The judgment summaries were generally prepared in English. They were translated into French and are being reviewed for accuracy of the translation.

Full judgment

Applicants/Appellants

Kisumiro

Entity

MONUSCO

Case Number(s)

UNDT/NBI/2023/055

Tribunal

UNDT

Registry

Nairobi